• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Volume 14 Staff
    • Volume 13 Staff
    • Past Mastheads
    • Subscriptions
    • Contact Us
    • For HLS Students
  • HLPR Blog
    • Notice and Comment
    • Write For Us
  • Online Pieces
  • Print Archive
    • Volume 13-2
    • Volume 13-1
    • Volume 12-1
    • Volume 11-2
    • Volume 11-1
    • Volume 10-2
    • Volume 10-1
    • Volume 9-2
    • Volume 9-1
    • Volume 8-2
    • Volume 8-1
    • Volume 7-2
    • Volume 7-1
    • Volume 6-2
    • Volume 6-1
    • Volume 5-2
    • Volume 5-1
    • Volume 4-2
    • Volume 4-1
    • Volume 3-2
    • Volume 3-1
    • Volume 2-2
    • Volume 2-1
    • Volume 1-2
    • Volume 1-1
  • Submissions

Harvard Law & Policy Review

Presidential Politics in 2012 – Sarkozy vs. Hollande

January 20, 2012 by hlsjrnldev

Peter Dunne

2012 is shaping up to be a bumper year for Presidential politics.

While the GOP candidates fight it out for their party’s nomination on this side of the Atlantic, the race to become France’s next President is just beginning to heat up.

As in the United States, the campaign appears to present two competing views of what society ought to be – lining up neatly along the traditional philosophies of Left and Right.

In one corner, there is the pro-business, Nicolas Sarkozy – the current office holder. He came to power in 2007, riding a wave of renewed optimism and promising to rewrite France’s social contract. Almost from the start, his tenure has been dogged by personal and political controversy – from his much-publicized romance with Carli Bruni, to the dealings of his close associates with L’Oreal heiress, Lilianne Bettencourt.

However, perhaps more than any other external factor, it may be Mr. Sarkozy’s actual record in office which ultimately ends his hopes of a second stint in the Palais de l’Élysée. Campaigning on a radical fiscal agenda, the President has found himself in office during one the worst financial crises in European history. His plans to overhaul the French economy have had to take a backseat as fiscal stability becomes the order of the day. While Mr. Sarkozy has won plaudits from many foreign observers for his handling of the crisis, he nevertheless continues to suffer criticism at home where many believe he has done too little to realize the promises which helped to elect him in 2007.

His main opponent is Francois Hollande. A former Secretary of the Socialist Party, Mr. Hollande was the long-term partner of Segolene Royal, who Mr. Sarkozy defeated in the 2007 election. It is widely believed that Mr. Hollande had actually intended to run five years ago, but was punished by Ms. Royal when she discovered that he had had an affair with a French journalist.

Mr. Hollande’s greatest asset in the election is likely to be the President’s unpopularity. His own profile among the French electorate is significantly lower than Ms. Royal’s was at this time in 2007. He also suffers from a lack of charisma, and has been roundly criticized for failing to get his campaign off the ground after his nomination in late 2011.

Perhaps most critically, however, Mr. Hollande may have to overcome two surprising obstacles which, were it any other country, may indeed be seen as relative strengths. First, like Ms. Royal, he is an “Enarque” – a graduate of the prestigious “Ecole Nationale d’Administration” which has turned out an astounding percentage of France’s leaders for the last fifty years. Mr. Sarkozy’s election in 2007 (where he very publicly lauded his lack of educational credentials) appeared to signal a move away from the old order. It is will be interesting to see whether, five years on, the public is willing to once again embrace an institution which has previously proven so divisive.

Secondly, Mr. Hollande was a senior player in the socialist party during the leftist government of Lionel Jospin (1997-2002). A central question will be whether Mr. Sarkozy can link Mr. Hollande to some of the more controversial policies of that era, including the thirty-five hour working week, which were so overwhelmingly rejected in 2007.

Filed Under: HLPR Blog: Notice and Comment

Primary Sidebar

Mailing List

Enter your email address to subscribe to the official HLPR mailing list!

Facebook

Facebook

Twitter

My Tweets

Tags

abortion aca affordable care act burwell v. hobby lobby campaign finance capital punishment citizens united civil rights congress contraception mandate criminal justice criminal justice reform death penalty Donald Trump education eighth amendment financial crisis first amendment food law fourteenth amendment gay marriage gay rights gun control gun violence health care HLPR Symposium hobby lobby immigration LGBT rights marriage equality obama obamacare Obama Legacy Symposium obergefell v. hodges policing President Obama religious freedom Republican rfra same sex marriage SCOTUS supreme court volume 9.1 voting rights voting rights act

Archives

Footer

Contact Us

For questions or comments, email hlpr@mail.law.harvard.edu or write to:

Harvard Law and Policy Review
1585 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138

Copyright © 2019 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in